Technical Report: Why Proportion of Discriminators is Method-Specific

ABSTRACT
“If we make this change only 10% of our consumers will be able to detect it”, may be a very appealing statement to managers in consumer products companies. These managers are often faced with the need to make product changes and substitutions to change ingredients, lower costs, switch to more stable sources of raw materials, comply with government regulations, or develop more healthful products. Usually there is an attempt to ensure that consumers notice as little difference as possible in the sensory performance of the product. In the food and personal care industries, methodologies used to investigate consumer perception include several discrimination techniques such as the duo-trio method, the triangular method and directional difference tests (such as the 2-Alternative Forced Choice or 2-AFC method.)


This technical report appears as:
Rousseau, B., & Ennis, D. M. (2007). Why Proportion of Discriminators is Method-Specific. IFPress, 10(3), 2-3.

Colleagues can download the entire technical report here:
Why Proportion of Discriminators is Method-Specific

Not a Colleague? Click here to join for free!

This technical report also appears in our book, Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science.

Tags: , ,

site search



Upcoming Webinar

June 15, 2017
2PM EDT

Claiming Equivalence, Unsurpassed, and Superiority Simultaneously

__________________

Announcing the release of the 2016 Webinar Series Package!

Offered at a discounted rate of 50% off regular price, this package contains recordings of all four webinars offered during the 2016 Quarterly Webinar Series.

Create Your Own Webinar Package

__________________

Webinar calendar

Membership

Become a Colleague!

Join now to gain access to our technical reports, presentations, and more!

Click here to login or join.

Latest Technical Report

Societies