Technical Report: Parity Claims

ABSTRACT
The recently reissued ASTM Claims Guide provides a useful classification of types of claims and recommendations concerning appropriate product testing. Figure 1 is a schematic summary of the claims discussed in that document. There are comparative and non-comparative claims. The comparative group includes superiority and parity claims. The guide separates parity claims into two types – equality and unsurpassed. An equality claim is justified when two products are essentially equivalent within some reasonably defined bounds on an attribute of interest. A product is unsurpassed when it exceeds the lower bound for equality. According to this definition, an unsurpassed claim can be made when a product meets the equality requirement or is superior. The guide provides the statistical tools to support an unsurpassed claim, but not an equality claim. In this report we will discuss both of these types of parity claims.


This technical report appears as:
Ennis, D. M. (2006). Parity Claims. IFPress, 9(4) 2-3.

Colleagues can download the entire technical report here:
Parity Claims

Not a Colleague? Click here to join for free!

This technical report also appears in our book, Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science.

Tags: , , , ,

Upcoming Webinar

September 21, 2017
2PM EDT

Large TURF Problems: Finding Custom Solutions

__________________

Announcing the release of the 2016 Webinar Series Package!

Offered at a discounted rate of 50% off regular price, this package contains recordings of all four webinars offered during the 2016 Quarterly Webinar Series.

Create Your Own Webinar Package

__________________

Webinar calendar

Membership

Become a Colleague!

Join now to gain access to our technical reports, presentations, and more!

Click here to login or join.

Student Award

Now accepting applications for the
2017 Institute for Perception Student Award

site search