Technical Report: Analytic Approaches to Accounting for Individual Ideal Points

When Goldilocks made her food and mattress choices, she exhibited a common preference for items of moderate intensity. Instead of the hottest or coldest, softest or hardest, she chose the intermediate points. Even in the case of her furniture choice where she chose the smallest chair, one could easily construct a sufficiently small chair that she would reject. Although there are attributes, such as luxury, fuel efficiency or off-taste, for which it might seem that there is no upper or lower bound on the desired level of the attribute, this is not generally the case. For many consumer products, sensory drivers of consumer liking have non-extreme optimum points for many consumers. Of course, there are people who crave higher and higher intensity and others who retreat to the lowest level of sensory stimulation, but in many cases they sit on the banks of the main flow of consumer choice.

This technical report appears as:
Ennis, D. M. (2005). Analytic Approaches to Accounting for Individual Ideal Points. IFPress, 8(2) 2-3.

Colleagues can download the entire technical report here:
Analytic Approaches to Accounting for Individual Ideal Points

Not a Colleague? Click here to join for free!

This technical report also appears in our book, Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science.

Tags: ,

Upcoming Webinar

September 21, 2017

Large TURF Problems: Finding Custom Solutions


Announcing the release of the 2016 Webinar Series Package!

Offered at a discounted rate of 50% off regular price, this package contains recordings of all four webinars offered during the 2016 Quarterly Webinar Series.

Create Your Own Webinar Package


Webinar calendar


Become a Colleague!

Join now to gain access to our technical reports, presentations, and more!

Click here to login or join.

Student Award

Now accepting applications for the
2017 Institute for Perception Student Award

site search