Technical Report: How to Account for “No Difference/Preference” Counts

Data obtained from many forced choice procedures such as the 2- and 3-alternative forced choice (2-AFC and 3-AFC), the duo-trio and the triangular methods, are often tested using the binomial distribution. In some applications of either difference or preference testing it is desirable to include a no difference or no preference option. One example occurs in claims support where there is a preference to include this option, but there are many other such applications in product testing for product development or quality assurance. Note that in this report we refer only to no difference counts although the ideas we present apply equally well to no preference counts. Also note that we refer to a two-alternative task with a no difference option as the 2-AC (2-alternative choice) in which the instruction is to choose the item of two (A and B) with the greatest or least amount of some attribute, or to indicate no difference.

This technical report appears as:
Ennis, D. M. and Ennis, J. M. (2011). How to Account for "No Difference/Preference" Counts. IFPress, 13(3) 2-3.

Colleagues can download the entire technical report here:
How to Account for “No Difference/Preference” Counts

Not a Colleague? Click here to join for free!

This technical report also appears in our book, Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science.

Tags: , ,

Upcoming Webinar

September 21, 2017

Large TURF Problems: Finding Custom Solutions


Announcing the release of the 2016 Webinar Series Package!

Offered at a discounted rate of 50% off regular price, this package contains recordings of all four webinars offered during the 2016 Quarterly Webinar Series.

Create Your Own Webinar Package


Webinar calendar


Become a Colleague!

Join now to gain access to our technical reports, presentations, and more!

Click here to login or join.

Student Award

Now accepting applications for the
2017 Institute for Perception Student Award

site search